Wednesday, November 11, 2009


The Phony War on Christmas

With Halloween still receding from our rear view mirrors, the wacky Christian Right has already started their annual bellyaching that Christmas is under attack. The American Family Association has launched a boycott of Gap, Old Navy and Banana Republic stores, due to the fact that this chain of mall stores chooses not to use the word "Christmas" in its holiday advertising. According to the AFA post, the Gap issued a "politically correct" statement that "Gap recognizes that many traditions are celebrated throughout this season and we feel it is important to display holiday signage that is inclusive to everyone."

In a country where, according to this study, 18.5% of Americans consider themselves non-Christian, is trying to create an atmospere of inclusiveness not a good idea?

The guy who is typically credited with coining the term "War on Chistmas," Peter Brimelow seems to be a fellow of dubious distinction. The Southern Poverty Law Center has a page about Brimelow in its Intelligence Report section, which is set up to monitor "hate groups and extremist activity in the US." Brimelow even appears to have gotten into a little dust up with Brad Krantz and Britt Whitmire, the hosts of one of the best local radio talk shows around, the Brad and Britt show on WZTK in Greensboro, NC.

For the record, let me say that I think that the whole thing is much ado about nothing. Much in the same way that the trade name Xerox became a shorthand term for photocopy or that Band-Aid has come to mean any self-adhesive bandage, or Jacuzzi has come to mean any hot tub, Christmas has become a
genericized trademark for a winter holiday. Modern Americans think more about the secular pantheon of Christmas; Scrooge, Santa, and Frosty the Snowman than they think about the religious figures that were once widely associated with it. What really upsets the culture warriors is that they see that the ground is shifting beneath their feet in regards to people's religious views. The sharp rise in those who identify themselves as atheists or agnostics has to be a particularly disturbing trend.

So rather than feeding the martyr complexes of right wing nutters like Brimelow, Bill O'Reilly, or the much put-upon Catholic League's Bill Donohue, when someone tells you "Merry Christmas," don't fight it. When you do that, the mental terrorists win. The best thing to do is to take the complete opposite tact and say thank you and talk about how much you love watching A Charlie Brown Christmas and how much you love to hear "Walking in a Winter Wonderland." Quibbling over whether or not to call the holiday season "Christmas" only stokes their petty little fire. If we use the term more often and more loosely, the mental association with the cult of the Nazarene will fade away just as the holiday's origins in the pagan festival of Saturnalia have faded from the collective consciousness of mainstream culture. The key to winning this battle of the culture war is not confrontation, it is assimilating the holiday completely into the popular culture.

12 comments:

  1. I had this same argument in History with some ignorant fuckhead who calls himself an atheist. Grr!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can't we just call it Xmas and make it a holiday of coolness and relevancy only to getting gifts and getting sloshed at office parties only to make inappropriate advances towards your boss and his wife? Nothing gets me in the holiday spirit more than seeing Gene Simmons in full Demon mode donning a santa hat as a cod piece! I really don't think it's fair to Jesus that St. Valentine gets the ONLY sexoliday! Yeah, let's make Christmas into seXmas!! hot! honestly though, i consider the emotion of the holiday more important than the religious or cultural significances... it's all about the love! HO!HO!HO!

    ReplyDelete
  3. If we measuring our society by the signage at Gap, then we really do have problems. Those who are celebrating Christmas as a religious festival should do so. Retailers are not obligated to show preference to any group, nor should they be. I'm not celebrating Kwanzaa, the Festival of Lights, or any other religious or quasi-religious observance during the November-January period, but others are and that is their call.
    It is sad that Christianity has been kidnapped by individuals and groups whose ultimate impact is to create loathing of those who truly are followers of Christ. I am left to wonder, however, if the SPLC lists itself in its Intelligen Report section.
    I also question the motives of atheists who single out and attack Christians. If one were truly an atheist, would they care to waste their time worrying about what people of one particular religion do. Why Christianity? What have the Jews, Muslims, or Buddhists done for you lately? Why do they not merit your attentions? Every December, the local TV stations wish everyone a Happy Hannukah. I will stand by for the tirade against the Jews... Oh right, that's not the trend in popular culture today. We're attacking Christians right now. Certainly some of these groups create far worse trouble than Christians who believe that their celebration is significant enough to be mentioned specifically in public without fear of reprisals from "atheists."
    If one chooses to live a life devoid of faith, then that is your God given (yes I said it) right. But "stoking their petty little fires" only betrays your own anger at God and the weakness of your "faith" in nothing. If you are so sure that Christians are wrong, then why worry, we're all just worm food. Why try to convince them otherwise? Maybe it's not the Christians who need convinced...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous #3 I wanted to take a few seconds and respond to a couple of things on your post.

    Item #1- You seem to suggest that you think that the SPLC should be on its Intelligence Report, which keeps track of extremist activity and hate groups. Why do you think that this is appropriate?

    Item #2- You also mention that you question the motives of atheists who single out and pick on Christianity. I don't know of any atheists who single our Chistianity for particularly rough treatment. It garners more attention than other superstitions because it is the most pervasive system of supernatural belief in the US and most other western nations. Let me personally assure you that I look at all variations of theistic belief as being equally ridiculous, from Islam to Hinduism to Christianity. I am a one man abattoir for sacred cows. The reason that I only mentioned Christians in the post is because the story that I was referencing was about a bunch of Christian wackos. Don't worry, the other wackos will get their turns too.

    Item #3- When I said "stoking their petty little fires," I was referring to those who are up in arms because a chain of mall stores refuses to aquiesce to these extremists' demands that their advertising materials use the term "Christmas," rather than acknowledging the fact that a multitude of other supernatural belief systems celebrate holidays at the same time. That is petty. Encouraging these people stokes their petty little fires.

    Item #4- I am no more angry with your god or any other god than I am with unicorns or leprechans.

    Item #5- Stay tuned for additional posts as to why I am (and others should be too) concerned about the perpetuation of superstitious theistic belief and why it is important to show people these dangers.

    Item #6- Thank you for posting. I appreciate the opportunity for dialogue. Although it may appear to people from non-atheist viewpoints that sometimes we are dogmatic, most of us are not. We just apply similar standards of evidence and reason to theistic claims most theists do. I am open to new information and will accept it into my worldview if it meets muster but all ideas stand in the same line and pass the same tests.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kimberly Lewis-FletcherNovember 15, 2009 at 7:58 PM

    Hey Billy! Sorry, William. (I flashed back to high school there for a moment!)I came across your blog via your Facebook page. You make alot of valid points about peoples attitudes regarding Christmas. While I am a christian, I do not support those in the "christian right" (whoever THEY are)that feel the need to attach God to every MAN MADE holiday. First and foremost because there is no mention of "holidays" as we know them in the Bible. I believe the catholic church started the whole December 25th thing. Secondly, we as christians are to remember Christs DEATH on the cross for our sins. The month of his BIRTH is irrelevant, and furthermore, was not even in December. Mary and Joseph were in Bethlehem for the census and to pay taxes, which other scripture shows did not occur in December. So Christmas, as with Valentine's Day, Labor Day, Grandparent's Day, etc. are all just another day we're supposed to feed the retail machine and purchase random junk we can't afford for friends and family in lieu of really bonding with them. (And to form rediculous groups-christian or otherwise- to shove our personal beliefs down everyone elses throat). Our Soldiers past and present fight for our freedom to be christian or athiest and to have stupid "holidays" and fight about how to "observe" them. A perfect example is Veteran's Day, which sadly for many is just another sale at JC Penney. So christian or athiest..Can't we all just get along?
    I look forward to reading your other posts...and I'll pray for you, but I won't shove it down your throat.. ;-D

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello again from Anonymous #3

    I believe that the SPLC is an extremist group. That is why they should be on the Intelligence report. Their push to legally eliminate opinions other than their own is what makes them extremist.

    I will be awaiting your disassembly of Ramadan (Those people don't have petty little fires to stoke. In their case its petty little IED's.) I certainly will not hold my breath. I've known you for a long time and never heard a word about any non-Christian reigion from you.

    By the way, I had no trouble understanding what "stoking their petty little fire" meant. If you will review my post, I think that is evident.

    A note to Kimberly...holidays are mentioned throughout the Bible..Jesus and his followers were eating Passover (a holiday) dinner the night before his execution. There is a painting of that particular Passover dinner called "The Last Supper". Of course the Jews hanging out with Jesus that night didn't know they were posing. The Romans were a partygoing group and rarely missed the opportunity to celebrate something. The holidays are mentioned, they just weren't/aren't Christian holidays. Remeber. Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian. And we are to remember Christ's resurrection and the defeat of death, not the death itself.

    I've read your post about prostitution and am trying to decide whether I care enough to respond. In general terms, I think I agree.

    However, because of the fact that in many cases the woman may have been put in the hotel lobby by other parties for their personal gain, and not for her own sexual gratification (pronounced "sexual slavery"), there may be more to consider than you initially illustrate.

    As far as the government goes; they just haven't figured out how to effectively tax nookie.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous #3. Can you provide me with a link in which the SPLC has tried to legally limit someone's opinion. I am not saying that they haven't, but I haven't seen anything like that.

    That being said, you have to be careful with any "watchdog" group to keep them from going overboard. I think that the concept of "hate speech" is an ill-advised idea that could have a chilling effect on free speech and would not support it. I am an absolutist when it comes to free speech.

    Recently in the UN, there was a push to enact a religious anti-defamation policy that was spearheaded by a group of Islamic countries. Again, this is a bad idea.

    As far as the Ramadan thing goes, I am going to write a post dedicated to Islam, which I think is an intrinsically violent and repressive religion, and other religions' roles in relationship to Islam.

    The reason that it seems like I cast a disproportional amount of condemnation on Christianity is simply because it is the predominant religion of the US.

    ReplyDelete
  8. violence is necessary! submission by brute force, the only way to go in my book! praise allah! ;P

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kimberly Lewis-FletcherNovember 23, 2009 at 10:23 PM

    Hello anonymous #3..

    Yes, I am fully aware of the "holidays" in the Bible which you mentioned. However, I spoke of HOLIDAYS AS WE KNOW THEM TODAY- Valentine's Day, Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc. NONE of which are chrisian, nearly all are pagan in origin and were twisted into something slightly different, and somehow labeled "christian". ESPECIALLY Christmas, which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Christ or the Passover meal you mentioned. But hey, let's take the sun festival(Roman), change the "sun to Son" and viola! Happy Birthday Jesus. Yes, the Romans did like to party, but they weren't christians, they were loyal to all things Caesar. Pontius Pilate (a Roman)gave the go ahead to kill Jesus because he was too gutless against an angry Jewish mob- who thought Jesus was just a man spreading lies..Also not behaving very "christian"..
    In a nutshell, my point was/is that our modern day version of "holidays" (commercialized, pre-packaged)have no religious significance and involve nothing that Jesus would want to be associated with. If these religious groups ever really opened a Bible and read it, they'd know God doesn't want observance of stupid "man-made" holidays and the ten commandments posted on courthouse lawns (where it will be treated with as much respect as a garden gnome). We are to obey His commandments, turn away from the sinful..(like pagan holidays that promote gluttony and overspending)preach the unperverted gospel to others, and hopefully win over a few souls for the big guy...BTW, DaVinci painted the Last Supper, and he was a Catholic. A religion well known for making it up as they go along...They were responsible for the whole "Christmas' (Christs Mass) thing as a way to win over those pesky pagans from their sun festivals...

    ReplyDelete
  10. pagan holidays that promote gluttony and overspending?
    true, the days coincide between ancient pagan holidays and the current christian celebrations of certain events, but the gluttony and overspending is far from the pagan traditions. am i misunderstanding you here? you do realize that it is a society of 'good' christian people that has done this to these holidays. *

    ReplyDelete
  11. Just because some people celebrate "commercialized, pre-packaged" holidays, does not mean everyone does. I seriously doubt that God has a problem with associating with those who truly celebrate the birth of Christ. I imagine He'd enjoy it if we celebrated Him more frequently than Sundays, Christmas, and Easter. Though I can't really speak for "The Big Guy" as a previous poster called Him. I do find it interesting that the religious holidays that have been turned the most commercial are Christian holidays. I've never heard of the Passover elf or Ramadan midnight sales. Of course that is most likely due to our nation's Christian heritage. I will definitely work to keep the secular/commericialized holidays and my religious worship separate. Even when the two happen to share a date.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well no matter who you are or who you're with or without and no matter how you choose to celebrate or not celebrate... i hope you're all safe and loved. Season's Greetings Yo!

    ReplyDelete

Let's have your $.02!